Methodological Considerations in Generating Provider Performance Scores for Use in Public Reporting: A Guide for Community Quality Collaboratives – AHRQ – September 2011

Posted on September 27, 2011. Filed under: Clin Governance / Risk Mgmt / Quality, Health Mgmt Policy Planning, Patient Participation | Tags: , , , |

Methodological Considerations in Generating Provider Performance Scores for Use in Public Reporting: A Guide for Community Quality Collaboratives – AHRQ – September 2011

“This [white] paper is intended for use by Chartered Value Exchanges (CVEs), community collaboratives, and other organizations interested in creating public reports on the performance of health care providers in their communities. It addresses the issue of inconsistent reports based on the same data and identifies the key methodological decision points that precede publication of a performance report.”

Friedberg MW, Damberg CL. Methodological Considerations in Generating Provider Performance Scores for Use in Public Reporting: A Guide for Community Quality Collaboratives. AHRQ Publication No. 11-0093, September 2011. Prepared by RAND Corporation under Contract No. HHSA290200810037C. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD.

Contents
Acknowledgments
Foreword
Executive Summary
Introduction
How This Paper Is Organized
Overarching Methodological Issue: Performance Misclassification
Decisions Encountered During Key Task Number 1: Negotiating Consensus on Goals and “Value Judgments” of Performance Reporting
Decisions Encountered During Key Task Number 2: Selecting the Measures That Will Be Used To Evaluate Provider Performance
Decisions Encountered During Key Task Number 3: Identifying Data Sources and Aggregating Performance Data
Decisions Encountered During Key Task Number 4: Checking Data Quality and Completeness
Decisions Encountered During Key Task Number 5: Computing Provider-Level Performance Scores
Decisions Encountered During Key Task Number 6: Creating Performance Reports
Summary of Methodological Decisions Made by a Sample of CVE Stakeholders
Appendix 1: Validity and Systematic Performance Misclassification
Appendix 2: Performance Misclassification Due to Chance
References

Advertisements

Make a Comment

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Liked it here?
Why not try sites on the blogroll...

%d bloggers like this: